From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Towards eliminating the freezer Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:54:16 +0200 Message-ID: <200707262254.16921.rjw@sisk.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-pm List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 26 July 2007 21:32, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > So, who's writing the patch? ;-) > > > > > > I can do it. You haven't made any changes to this part of the code, > > > have you? > > > > Yes, I have, quite recently. :-) > > > > > My work tends to be based on Linus's tree, not -mm. > > > > At the moment they are pretty much in line, at least as far as this code is > > concerned. Anyway, I'm trying to keep track of PM-related patches, > > at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.23-rc1/ > > I got your snapshot file. None of the patches in it modify anything > in drivers/base/power/*, so there shouldn't be any interference. I think that's correct. > By the way, just checking: Apparently when device_power_down() in > suspend.c calls sysdev_suspend(), if there's an error it doesn't then > call dpm_power_up(). Is it correct to assume this is a bug? Yes. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth