From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:26:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708010026.56427.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708010025.27018.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Use the observation that try_to_freeze_tasks() need not loop while waiting for
the freezing tasks to enter the refrigerator and make it use a wait queue.
The idea is that after sending freeze requests to the tasks regarded as
freezable try_to_freeze_tasks() can go to sleep and wait until at least one task
enters the refrigerator. The first task that does it wakes up
try_to_freeze_tasks() and the procedure is repeated. If the refrigerator is not
entered by any tasks before TIMEOUT expires, the freezing of tasks fails.
This way, try_to_freeze_tasks() doesn't occupy the CPU unnecessarily when some
freezing tasks are waiting for I/O to complete.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
kernel/power/process.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc1/kernel/power/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1.orig/kernel/power/process.c 2007-07-31 21:58:32.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1/kernel/power/process.c 2007-07-31 23:00:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
*/
#define TIMEOUT (20 * HZ)
+/*
+ * Time to wait until one or more tasks enter the refrigerator after sending
+ * freeze requests to them.
+ */
+#define WAIT_TIME (HZ / 5)
+
#define FREEZER_KERNEL_THREADS 0
#define FREEZER_USER_SPACE 1
@@ -43,6 +49,18 @@ static inline void frozen_process(void)
clear_freeze_flag(current);
}
+/*
+ * Wait queue head used by try_to_freeze_tasks() to wait for tasks to enter the
+ * refrigerator.
+ */
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(refrigerator_waitq);
+
+/*
+ * Used to notify try_to_freeze_tasks() that the refrigerator has been entered
+ * by a task.
+ */
+static int refrigerator_called;
+
/* Refrigerator is place where frozen processes are stored :-). */
void refrigerator(void)
{
@@ -58,6 +76,10 @@ void refrigerator(void)
task_unlock(current);
return;
}
+
+ refrigerator_called = 1;
+ wake_up(&refrigerator_waitq);
+
save = current->state;
pr_debug("%s entered refrigerator\n", current->comm);
@@ -170,6 +192,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez
unsigned int todo;
end_time = jiffies + TIMEOUT;
+ refrigerator_called = 0;
do {
todo = 0;
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -189,7 +212,16 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(int freez
todo++;
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- yield(); /* Yield is okay here */
+
+ if (todo) {
+ unsigned long ret;
+
+ ret = wait_event_timeout(refrigerator_waitq,
+ refrigerator_called, WAIT_TIME);
+ if (ret)
+ refrigerator_called = 0;
+ }
+
if (time_after(jiffies, end_time))
break;
} while (todo);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-25 12:01 [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/2] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 12:03 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/2] Freezer: Be more verbose Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-25 12:09 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/2] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-25 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-25 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-26 12:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 8:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 9:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:00 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 10:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 10:02 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:25 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/3] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping (updated) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-31 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-08-01 7:59 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] Freezer: Use wait queue instead of busy looping Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:28 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/3] Freezer: Measure the time of freezing tasks Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-01 8:28 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 22:29 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] Freezer: Replace the timeout Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-01 8:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-01 10:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-05 21:37 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-05 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-05 22:53 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708010026.56427.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=dilinger@debian.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox