From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/4] Hibernation: Turn on ACPI during restore if necessary Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:36:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20070821233629.GA3706@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200708201510.03734.rjw@sisk.pl> <200708201516.03537.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070821075755.GF7258@elf.ucw.cz> <200708211639.02204.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708211639.02204.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, pm list , Nigel Cunningham List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2007-08-21 16:39:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 August 2007 09:57, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > If the boot kernel doesn't support ACPI and ACPI is not enabled by the platform > > > boot code, it may be possible to enable ACPI after restoring the system memory > > > from a hibernation image. Implement that. > > > > ACK... and I guess this should go in early. It is possible to test w/o > > rest of patches, (just pass acpi=off to resume kernel, no?), > > Yup, that might work. > > > and it should get lot of testing. > > Why do you think so? Anything that touches acpi is almost guaranteed to produce nice fireworks :-). Okay, maybe I'm too paranoid. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html