From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: <200708252027.26721.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200708241206.57178.rjw@sisk.pl> <200708241211.55319.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070824204632.GA5008@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070824204632.GA5008@ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andrew Morton , pm list , Andi Kleen , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 24 August 2007 22:46, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! >=20 > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > >=20 > > Make it possible to restore a hibernation image on x86_64 with the he= lp of a > > kernel different from the one in the image. > >=20 > > The idea is to split the core restoration code into two separate part= s and to > > place each of them in a different page. =A0The first part belongs to = the boot >=20 > What happens in case where both parts want to be > at the same place? (Like kernel being restored is 4KB smaller, so that > routines now collide?) Bad things, but I can't see how to avoid that reliably. Greetings, Rafael