From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:06:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20070920180623.5d7da7b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1190266447.21818.17.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20070920100941.GA12157@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200709211024.35991.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200709211024.35991.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: nigel@suspend2.net Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kexec@smtp2.linux-foundation.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , "Huang, Ying" , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +1000 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Andrew. > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:09:41 Pavel Machek wrote: > > Seems like good enough for -mm to me. > > > > Pavel > > Andrew, if I recall correctly, you said a while ago that you didn't want > another hibernation implementation in the vanilla kernel. If you're going to > consider merging this kexec code, will you also please consider merging > TuxOnIce? > The theory is that kexec-based hibernation will mainly use preexisting kexec code and will permit us to delete the existing hibernation implementation. That's different from replacing it.