From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:16:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200710052316.10215.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200710051749.52685.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP? > > > > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power . > > Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?... Select doesn't work really well. It probably would be better to add something like APM_SUSPEND depending on SUSPEND. Greetings, Rafael