From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
huffcslists@gmail.com,
"linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8995] New: /proc/acpi/alarm worked; update to 2.6.22.2 and /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm don't
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:25:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711041125.35163.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709091332.44709.rjw@sisk.pl>
Re http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8995 ...
On Sunday 09 September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I think the suspend/hibernation code ordering changes after
> 2.6.20 are to blame here.
So what's the status of this now ... are we back to having
the /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm work with ACPI again, with
/sys/power/state written as "standby", "mem", or "disk"
(At least on the systems where it used to work. I've had
bad luck with ACPI wake on most systems. So while it'd be
great to see it working everywhere, I'm just asking about
the regression here.)
- Dave
p.s. some folk may need the appended patch.
===== CUT HERE
From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
This patch fixes rtc-cmos to ignore the two upper bits when reading
the BCD mday (day of month) register from CMOS. Some systems (eg. mine)
seem to have the top bit set to "1" for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c 2007-11-03 16:24:09.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c 2007-11-03 16:26:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@
t->time.tm_hour = CMOS_READ(RTC_HOURS_ALARM);
if (cmos->day_alrm) {
- t->time.tm_mday = CMOS_READ(cmos->day_alrm);
+ /* ignore upper bits on readback per ACPI spec */
+ t->time.tm_mday = CMOS_READ(cmos->day_alrm) & 0x3f;
if (!t->time.tm_mday)
t->time.tm_mday = -1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-8995-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-09-09 0:29 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8995] New: /proc/acpi/alarm worked; update to 2.6.22.2 and /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm don't Andrew Morton
2007-09-09 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-04 19:25 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-11-04 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200711042056.56763.rjw@sisk.pl>
2007-11-05 16:11 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711041125.35163.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=huffcslists@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox