From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PM: make freezer optional for suspend Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:25:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20071119162503.GA5147@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1194980670.6695.1.camel@johannes.berg> <200711142230.14662.rjw@sisk.pl> <1195145246.13846.68.camel@johannes.berg> <200711152124.25136.rjw@sisk.pl> <1195228712.8147.151.camel@johannes.berg> <20071118182107.GA5474@ucw.cz> <1195483246.8642.3.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1195483246.8642.3.camel@johannes.berg> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Len Brown , linux-pm List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > > > It can't really. Things break. Ben and Paul just don't want to hear > > > > > about it. I made it depend on BROKEN so people can take it out and see > > > > > what breaks (to possibly fix it), and depend on ADB_PMU so they can have > > > > > their favourite setting without enabling BROKEN. > > > > > > > > I understand that, but it's a bit confusing to put ADB_PMU, which is specific > > > > to powerpc, into the generic configuration file. > > > > > > Alright, I'll give it some thought and repost later. Maybe > > > ARCH_DOESNT_WANT_FREEZER ;) > > > > What about just > > > > a) reverse the logic, so that it is C_SUSPEND_NO_FREEZER > > > > b) hardcode it in ppc-specific config? > > I also wanted people interested in debugging things w/o the freezer to > use it. I'd say that people interested in debugging can just edit the config manually :-). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html