From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:49:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071210081952.GA7215@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071209074647.GE22981@elte.hu>
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:46:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/08/2007 04:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > i'm wondering why it had no effect now
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> > index e0d3a4f..a46c252 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -47,15 +47,21 @@ void __init cpu_hotplug_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > -
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> > void get_online_cpus(void)
> > {
> > + outb(0x20, 0x80);
> > might_sleep();
> > + outb(0x21, 0x80);
>
> ah. If you comment out get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() from
> kernel/softlockup.c, does it start working?
>
> Gautham, any ideas?
Hi Ingo,
>From the code I fail to see how get_online_cpus() can help us.
+ /*
+ * Only do the hung-tasks check on one CPU:
+ */
+ get_online_cpus();
+ check_cpu = any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map);
+ put_online_cpus();
check_cpu can go offline here, no?
+
+ if (this_cpu != check_cpu)
+ continue;
+
+ if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
+ check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(this_cpu);
Further more this can cause a deadlock since we're calling
get_online_cpus() from the watchdog thread's context,
which is going to be kthread_stop'ed from a cpu-hotplug context.
This is what I think was happening in the case reported by Jiri.
Please find the patch below.
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
commit 15bfb662b35c609490185fba2fd4713d230b9374
Author: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Dec 10 13:41:45 2007 +0530
softlockup: remove get_online_cpus() which doesn't help here.
The get_online_cpus() protection seems to be bogus
in kernel/softlockup.c as cpu cached in check_cpu can go offline
once we do a put_online_cpus().
This can also cause deadlock during a cpu offline as follows:
WATCHDOG_THREAD: OFFLINE_CPU:
mutex_down(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
/* All subsequent get_online_cpus
* will be blocked till we're
* done with this cpu-hotplug
* operation.
*/
get_online_cpus();
/* watchdog is blocked
Thus we cannot
go further until
the cpu-hotplug
operation completes
*/
CPU_DEAD:
kthread_stop(watchdog_thread);
/* we're trying to stop a
* thread which is blocked
* waiting for us to finish.
*
* Since we cannot finish until
* the thread stops, we deadlock here!
*/
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linuxtronix.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Van <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index e50b44a..576eb9c 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -219,9 +219,7 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
/*
* Only do the hung-tasks check on one CPU:
*/
- get_online_cpus();
check_cpu = any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map);
- put_online_cpus();
if (this_cpu != check_cpu)
continue;
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-10 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-12-07 14:34 ` broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1] Jiri Slaby
2007-12-07 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20071207151150.GB24254@elte.hu>
2007-12-07 17:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-08 8:10 ` Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <475A5188.6070809@gmail.com>
2007-12-08 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20071208083939.GD30997@elte.hu>
2007-12-08 9:23 ` Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <475A629C.7010408@gmail.com>
2007-12-08 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-08 17:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-12-08 17:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-12-08 23:12 ` Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <475B24F4.3090904@gmail.com>
2007-12-09 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20071209074647.GE22981@elte.hu>
2007-12-09 9:09 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-12-10 8:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2007-12-10 8:55 ` Jiri Slaby
[not found] ` <475CFF01.2090502@gmail.com>
2007-12-10 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-10 10:15 ` Gautham R Shenoy
[not found] ` <20071210101500.GB12880@in.ibm.com>
2007-12-10 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20071210102157.GB31103@elte.hu>
2007-12-10 11:08 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-10 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20071210112832.GA20189@elte.hu>
2007-12-10 11:49 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-10 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <475AD7D0.8040905@gmail.com>
2007-12-09 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071210081952.GA7215@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox