public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:17:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712150117.21895.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0712141129200.4768-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > hm, that was all fairly helpful.  <looks at the document> <erk, long>
> > 
> > This:
> 
> > gives me this:
> > 
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/pc131699.jpg
> > 
> > which identifies your culprit: msr.
> > 
> > I'd suggest that the above debug patch be turned into some
> > boot-option-enabled thing and that it be rolled out with this locking
> > change for a while at least.
> 
> Rafael, that looks like exactly the same sort of problem as we saw 
> before.  Global searching for CPU_DEAD_FROZEN shows several other 
> places that perhaps also could be simplified; the actions they take may 
> or may not be needed for hibernation.
> 
> The following three seem definitely dangerous:
> 
> 	arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c
> 	arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c
> 	arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> 
> And of course the third is the one that Andrew spotted.  Would you like 
> to address them?

Yes, I think I can take care of them, but not earlier than on Sunday.

> I can package up Andrew's debugging changes into a real patch.

Yes, that certainly is worth doing. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-15  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-21 19:37 [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending Alan Stern
2007-09-21 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-10 20:42 ` patch pm-acquire-device-locks-prior-to-suspending.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2007-12-13  7:42 ` [PATCH] PM: acquire device locks prior to suspending Andrew Morton
2007-12-13 16:02   ` Alan Stern
2007-12-13 21:38     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 15:32       ` Alan Stern
2007-12-13 16:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  0:08     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  0:22       ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  1:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-14  7:20     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14  7:31     ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-14 16:49       ` Alan Stern
2007-12-15  0:17         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-17 22:50 Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200712150117.21895.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox