From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: invoke suspend notifications after console switch Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:00:32 +0100 Message-ID: <200801101800.32921.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1197853799.4885.7.camel@johannes.berg> <1199970876.3861.66.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1199970876.3861.66.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-pm List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 10 of January 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 02:09 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > A subsequent patch will enable apm-emulation notification for suspends > > triggered in any way by using the suspend notifications. This causes > > the system to lock up between X being needed to switch away from the > > VT and X already waiting for resume in the apm ioctl. > > > > This patch moves the console switch (if enabled) before the suspend > > notification (and after the resume notification) to avoid this issue. > > I don't see this in the suspend git tree yet, anything wrong with it? No, it's fine. I was distracted by the recent ACPI ordering issue, will push it to Len shortly. Thanks, Rafael