From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Corbacho Subject: Re: ACPI_WMI: worst config description of all times Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 02:02:40 +0000 Message-ID: <200802080202.41355.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> References: <20080207214715.GA15211@elf.ucw.cz> <200802080119.08872.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <2c0942db0802071738g2f426d4y6ee9ab58b62d8174@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0802071738g2f426d4y6ee9ab58b62d8174@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ray Lee Cc: Pavel Machek , Len Brown , kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday 08 February 2008 01:38:01 Ray Lee wrote: > That's clear to me (whereas the original wasn't), though I would > still argue for this driver being select'ed by the drivers that > require it. As you note, other laptop specific drivers do so, and > Linus has come down in favor of that as well in the past, so you have > a friend in high places :-). I have some other patches lined up to do so. Unless I hear some arguments against it, or some better alternatives, I'll put them together with this and get Len to apply them to the ACPI tree (and then hopefully push back out before the -rc1 release). -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D