From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:23:15 +0100 Message-ID: <200802081723.16354.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20080205190600.GB11613@elf.ucw.cz> <47AB975C.1010902@zytor.com> <20080208070419.GA4544@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080208070419.GA4544@ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! Hi, > > >I really need the entry point to be at offset 0, so > > >that I can get > > >pointers to my data. I could not figure out how to do > > >it any other > > >way. And if 0 is taken, I thought I'd put header at the > > >end. > > > > > > > Why not just put the structure at 0, and put pointers in > > the structure to everything else you need? > > segments:offsets rear its ugly head here. I need %ds to point to my > data, and the way to do it is copy it from %cs; that needs start to be > at 0. Hm, why exactly is that necessay? Rafael