From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:17:58 +0100 Message-ID: <200802200117.58533.rjw@sisk.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 19 of February 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Hi, > Could anyone explain me why APM depends on PM_SLEEP? Because it refers to the code in drivers/base/power/main.c that depends on PM_SLEEP. > Isn't it a valid configuration, when I don't want to sleep / suspend, but > need APM to, say, turn my machine off using > APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF, or if I need APM_DISPLAY_BLANK? Yes, in theory, but that would require some more fine-grained #ifdeffing or something similar. Thanks, Rafael