From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6 (was Re: Suspend and hibernation patchset against -rc6) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:54:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20080319145448.GA26416@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200803120129.25585.rjw@sisk.pl> <200803172317.33745.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080318130642.GA1609@elf.ucw.cz> <20080318130710.GB1609@elf.ucw.cz> <20080318225201.GA2115@elf.ucw.cz> <20080319114851.GB21270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list , Alexey Starikovskiy , Johannes Berg List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed 2008-03-19 07:47:06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Ok, 7c0... is innocent. Reverting not only the mdelay, but also rest > > of drivers/acpi/ec.c patch fixed the > > "rc6-breaks-backlight-in-X-over-lid-close", good. > > Can you clarify a bit? > > Do you mean that the full revert of 2c81ce4 that already got committed is > sufficient for you, or do you need to totally undo everything we've done > to ec.c since -rc5, and thus also to revert the _other_ revert we did (in > 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429)? I believe that current mainline is okay, and will test that theory shortly. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/