Re: s2ram: warn when interrupts should be disabled but are not

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:53:11 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> 
> sysdevs should be suspended/resumed with IRQs disabled; if something
> reenables them by mistake, we want to know early.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> 
> ---
> commit fc3bccaf69e6c05464e7154369639bd5c96ccdc1
> tree bf960093ddb840242a00b4ec456ec79472b1c2ad
> parent 308e9d5309f378209e931f63f729806ec0a4d9f1
> author Pavel <pavel@amd.ucw.cz> Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:52:05 +0200
> committer Pavel <pavel@amd.ucw.cz> Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:52:05 +0200
> 
>  drivers/ata/ahci.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/base/sys.c |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/sys.c b/drivers/base/sys.c
> index 8e13fd9..e214467 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/sys.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  
>  #include "base.h"
>  
> @@ -367,6 +368,7 @@ int sysdev_suspend(pm_message_t state)
>  			/* Call auxillary drivers first */
>  			list_for_each_entry(drv, &cls->drivers, entry) {
>  				if (drv->suspend) {
> +					WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>  					ret = drv->suspend(sysdev, state);
>  					if (ret)
>  						goto aux_driver;

Is this warning ever triggers I expect we'll really really wish that
we'd done the check _after_ calling drv->suspend, and that we had also
done a print_symbol(drv->suspend).  No?


> @@ -442,6 +444,7 @@ int sysdev_resume(void)
>  		list_for_each_entry(sysdev, &cls->kset.list, kobj.entry) {
>  			pr_debug(" %s\n", kobject_name(&sysdev->kobj));
>  
> +			WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>  			__sysdev_resume(sysdev);
>  		}
>  	}

Perhaps here too.