From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Suspend, followed by immediate resume Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:43:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20080514144357.GC6260@ucw.cz> References: <20080501214437.0ae618c5@osprey.hogchain.net> <200805021859.57457.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080502122910.429312a7@osprey.hogchain.net> <200805021941.08003.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080502131003.15f45b82@osprey.hogchain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080502131003.15f45b82@osprey.hogchain.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jay Cliburn Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Does it suspend if you don't activate the WOL? > > Yes, it suspends even if WOL is disabled. > > I poked around in BIOS and changed the behavior somewhat. There's a > BIOS setting called "Suspend Mode" with three options: > > S1 (POS) only > S3 only > Auto > > When set to "S3 only" or "Auto," the machine spontaneously resumes > following a suspend. When set to "S1 (POS) only" the machine stays > asleep. > > What is "POS" an acronym for? Does it make sense to leave the thing > set to "S1 only?" Pile of s*t? Point of sales? S1 may make sense for testing wake-on-lan, yes. It is pretty useless otherwise. You should be able to do echo 1 > /proc/acpi/sleep to emulate it... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html