From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: Power management for SCSI Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:56:27 +0200 Message-ID: <200808151756.28313.oneukum@suse.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Pavel Machek , Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag 15 August 2008 17:25:13 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote: > = > > Am Freitag 15 August 2008 00:25:28 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > = > > > > The core problem is that you insist on a rigid bottom-to-top flow of > > > > autosuspensions. That's good for systems like USB and PCI which > > > > are trees for PM purposes. It makes no sense for true busses with > > > > equal members on the bus. > > > = > > > My framework is tree-oriented because it's based on the driver model, = > > > which uses a tree of devices. > > = > > Which uses a tree because PCI and USB are. > = > How do you know? =A0Is that just a guess based on some of Greg KH's and > Pat Mochel's previous activities? =A0Did you ask them? Greg, do you remember? Regards Oliver