From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Suspend-Resume support in sparc64 kernel? Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:49:34 +0100 Message-ID: <200810292149.35326.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200810291325.43694.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Shaddy Baddah Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 29 of October 2008, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 29 of October 2008, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any Suspend-Resume support in the sparc64 kernel? > > > > Do you mean suspend to RAM or hibernation? > > I mean suspend to RAM, which is what I believe the Suspend-Resume > referred to in the document > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/805-4433/6j46udqi7?l=en&a=view&q=power+management > also refers to. > > My uninformed research into it gives me an indication that it is not. > And I'm curious as to whether there was some history to its possible > exclusion, or it is just something that no one has ever attempt to > implement. I think no one has ever tried it, although you should ask SPARC architecture developers/maintainers about that. Thanks, Rafael