From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] hibernation should work ok with memory hotplug Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:35:48 +0100 Message-ID: <200811041635.49932.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20081029105956.GA16347@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200811040954.34969.rjw@sisk.pl> <1225812111.12673.577.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1225812111.12673.577.camel@nimitz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Matt Tolentino , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pavel@suse.cz, Mel Gorman , Andy Whitcroft , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 4 of November 2008, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 09:54 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > To handle this, I need to know two things: > > 1) what changes of the zones are possible due to memory hotplugging > > (i.e. can they grow, shring, change boundaries etc.) > > All of the above. OK If I allocate a page frame corresponding to specific pfn, is it guaranteed to be associated with the same pfn in future? > > 2) what kind of locking is needed to prevent zones from changing. > > The amount of locking is pretty minimal. We depend on some locking in > sysfs to keep two attempts to online from stepping on the other. > > There is the zone_span_seq*() set of functions. These are used pretty > sparsely, but we do use them in page_outside_zone_boundaries() to notice > when a zone is resized. > > There are also the pgdat_resize*() locks. Those are more for internal > use guarding the sparsemem structures and so forth. > > Could you describe a little more why you need to lock down zone > resizing? Do you *really* mean zones, or do you mean "the set of memory > on the system"? The latter, but our internal data structures are designed with zones in mind. > Why walk zones instead of pgdats? This is a historical thing rather than anything else. I think we could switch to pgdats, but that would require a code rewrite that's likely to introduce bugs, while our image-creating code is really well tested and doesn't change very often. Thanks, Rafael