Re: [PATCH 03/13] PM: Implement wakelock api.

Arve Hjønnevåg
2009-02-07T00:47:59Z

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:33 PM, mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_WAKELOCK_STAT
>> >> + create_proc_read_entry("wakelocks", S_IRUGO, NULL,
>> >> + wakelocks_read_proc, NULL);
>> >
>> > Shouldn't we *not* be using /proc? I think this should be under sysfs.
>>
>> It is not allowed under sysfs. Debugfs has been suggested, but we
>> don't have debugfs mounted, and we include the wakelock stats in debug
>> reports.
>>
>
> why not under sysfs?

The rules for sysfs state that there should be one value or an array
of values per file.

--
Arve Hjønnevåg