public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchi@gandalf.sssup.it>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Disable suspend on a specific device] This is a little change in linux power scheme
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:45:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904071545.03167.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407102914.GA25796@gandalf.sssup.it>

On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Michael Trimarchi wrote:
> This is a little rework of linux power scheme. TODO:
> - remove recursive call
> - clean-up code
> 
> Avoid suspend of a device that is connected with other coprocessor
> like GSM chip.

Well, can you please tell us a bit about the motivation for this work?

I don't like the approach, but I'd like to know what you're trying to achieve.

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchi@gandalf.sssup.it>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 3098c46..2a6ddb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,40 @@ void device_pm_unlock(void)
>  	mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
>  }
>  
> +int device_set_may_suspend_enable(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	/* if the device is suspend the subtree is in may_suspend status */
> +	if (!dev->power.can_suspend)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	dev->power.may_suspend = (unsigned int)data;
> +	device_for_each_child(dev, data,
> +			      device_set_may_suspend_enable);
> +out:
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + *	device_set_suspend_enable - enable/disable device to suspend
> + */
> +int device_set_suspend_enable(struct device *dev, int enable)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> +
> +	if (dev->power.can_suspend == !!enable)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Update device children to avoid suspend */
> +	device_for_each_child(dev, (void *)!!enable,
> +			      device_set_may_suspend_enable);
> +
> +	dev->power.can_suspend = !!enable;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_set_suspend_enable);
> +
>  /**
>   *	device_pm_add - add a device to the list of active devices
>   *	@dev:	Device to be added to the list
> @@ -77,6 +111,13 @@ void device_pm_add(struct device *dev)
>  		if (dev->parent->power.status >= DPM_SUSPENDING)
>  			dev_warn(dev, "parent %s should not be sleeping\n",
>  				 dev_name(dev->parent));
> +		if (!device_can_suspend(dev->parent)) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> +			/* if the parent has suspend disable, propagate it
> +			 * to the new child */
> +			device_set_may_suspend_enable(dev, 0);
> +			mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx);
> +		}
>  	} else if (transition_started) {
>  		/*
>  		 * We refuse to register parentless devices while a PM
> @@ -120,13 +161,13 @@ static int pm_op(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_ops *ops,
>  	switch (state.event) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
>  	case PM_EVENT_SUSPEND:
> -		if (ops->suspend) {
> +		if (device_can_suspend(dev) && ops->suspend) {
>  			error = ops->suspend(dev);
>  			suspend_report_result(ops->suspend, error);
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case PM_EVENT_RESUME:
> -		if (ops->resume) {
> +		if (device_can_suspend(dev) && ops->resume) {
>  			error = ops->resume(dev);
>  			suspend_report_result(ops->resume, error);
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/power.h b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> index 41f51fa..1197b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
>  static inline void device_pm_init(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	dev->power.status = DPM_ON;
> +	dev->power.can_suspend = 1;
> +	dev->power.may_suspend = 1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int device_can_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return (dev->power.can_suspend && dev->power.may_suspend);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c b/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
> index 596aeec..25236aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/sysfs.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,34 @@
>  static const char enabled[] = "enabled";
>  static const char disabled[] = "disabled";
>  
> +static ssize_t suspend_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", device_can_suspend(dev)
> +		? enabled : disabled);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +suspend_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +		const char *buf, size_t n)
> +{
> +	char *cp;
> +	int len = n;
> +
> +	cp = memchr(buf, '\n', n);
> +	if (cp)
> +		len = cp - buf;
> +	if (len == sizeof enabled - 1
> +			&& strncmp(buf, enabled, sizeof enabled - 1) == 0)
> +		device_set_suspend_enable(dev, 1);
> +	else if (len == sizeof disabled - 1
> +			&& strncmp(buf, disabled, sizeof disabled - 1) == 0)
> +		device_set_suspend_enable(dev, 0);
> +	else
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	return n;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t
>  wake_show(struct device * dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char * buf)
>  {
> @@ -76,10 +104,11 @@ wake_store(struct device * dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  }
>  
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(wakeup, 0644, wake_show, wake_store);
> -
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(suspend, 0644, suspend_show, suspend_store);
>  
>  static struct attribute * power_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_wakeup.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_suspend.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  static struct attribute_group pm_attr_group = {
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index fdb073b..dc9f242 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ extern struct device *device_find_child(struct device *dev, void *data,
>  				int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data));
>  extern int device_rename(struct device *dev, char *new_name);
>  extern int device_move(struct device *dev, struct device *new_parent);
> +extern int device_set_suspend_enable(struct device *dev, int enable);
>  
>  /*
>   * Root device objects for grouping under /sys/devices
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index de2e0a8..7586a90 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>  	pm_message_t		power_state;
>  	unsigned		can_wakeup:1;
>  	unsigned		should_wakeup:1;
> +	unsigned		can_suspend:1;
> +	unsigned		may_suspend:1;
> +
>  	enum dpm_state		status;		/* Owned by the PM core */
>  #ifdef	CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  	struct list_head	entry;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-07 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-07 10:29 [RFC Disable suspend on a specific device] This is a little change in linux power scheme Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-07 13:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-04-07 15:39   ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-07 18:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-07 19:01       ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-07 20:40         ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-07 20:57         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-07 21:31           ` Alan Stern
2009-04-07 21:38             ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-07 22:25               ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-04-08  5:59                 ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-08  8:13                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-08  8:24                     ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-08  8:34                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-08  8:45                         ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-07  8:06                           ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-20 12:46                             ` Mark Brown
2009-04-20 12:55                               ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-08 11:42                         ` Mark Brown
2009-04-08 16:44                           ` Igor Stoppa
2009-04-08 18:23                             ` Mark Brown
2009-04-08 19:53                               ` Igor Stoppa
2009-04-09 14:33                                 ` Mark Brown
2009-04-07 21:40             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-08 11:53               ` Mark Brown
2009-04-08 16:45                 ` Igor Stoppa
2009-04-10 11:17                 ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-08 20:37               ` Alan Stern
2009-04-08 21:25                 ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-04-08 21:56                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-09 18:27                   ` Alan Stern
2009-04-09 22:33                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904071545.03167.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trimarchi@gandalf.sssup.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox