From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] pm: rename device_power_down/up() Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:32:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20090514183232.GA14432@suse.de> References: <20090514122356.19418.31612.sendpatchset@rx1.opensource.se> <200905141943.53151.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905141943.53151.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:43:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 14 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > > From: Magnus Damm > > > > Rename the functions performing "_noirq" dev_pm_ops > > operations from device_power_down() and device_power_up() > > to device_suspend_noirq() and device_resume_noirq(). > > > > The new function names are chosen to show that the functions > > are responsible for calling the _noirq() versions to finalize > > the suspend/resume operation. The current function names do > > not perform power down/up anymore so the names may be misleading. > > > > Global function renames: > > - device_power_down() -> device_suspend_noirq() > > - device_power_up() -> device_resume_noirq() > > > > Static function renames: > > - suspend_device_noirq() -> __device_suspend_noirq() > > - resume_device_noirq() -> __device_resume_noirq() > > Pavel, Alan, Greg, any objections? No objection from me: Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman