From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29 Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20090518151102.GA6241@elte.hu> References: <_AjETDMbIoL.A.DcH.RYzDKB@chimera> <20090517073327.GC1583@elte.hu> <20090518145725.GB18607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090518145725.GB18607@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Adrian Bunk , DRI , Linux ACPI , Linux SCSI List , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Wireless List , Kumar Gala , Natalie Protasevich , Martin Bammer , Linus Torvalds , Network Development , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Jeff Garzik , Linux PM List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org * Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107 > > > Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1 > > > Submitter : Kumar Gala > > > Date : 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old) > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b3bfa0cba867f23365b81658b47efd906830879b > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123929187208953&w=4 > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/193 > > > Handled-By : Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > > > Oleg says in that thread that it's as-designed, and followup > > questions were not replied to (yet). > > Yes, I think this is false alarm. Perhaps I missed something, and > I am waiting for more info from Kumar, but it looks like ltp was > already changed to skip the "{ PTRACE_ATTACH, 1, EPERM }" test on > kernels after 2.6.25 Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the test? Timing differences look improbable. Ingo