public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Suspend problems in 2.6.31-rc6
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:22:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908190122.17015.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0908181149300.2684-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Tuesday 18 August 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > It appears that some part of the resume messed up the VT console
> > driver.
> 
> I have narrowed this down.  The problem occurs in agp_intel_resume()
> in drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c.  Here's the beginning of the routine:
> 
> 
> static int agp_intel_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> 	struct agp_bridge_data *bridge = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> 	int ret_val;
> 
> 	pci_restore_state(pdev);
> 
> 	/* We should restore our graphics device's config space,
> 	 * as host bridge (00:00) resumes before graphics device (02:00),
> 	 * then our access to its pci space can work right.
> 	 */
> 	if (intel_private.pcidev)
> 		pci_restore_state(intel_private.pcidev);
> 
> 
> As the comment says, pdev is 0000:00:00.0 and intel_private.pcidev is
> 0000:00:02.0.  So this is the resume routine for 00:00.0, and it calls
> pci_restore_state() for 00:02.0 before that device has been resumed.
> 
> Note that there is no corresponding agp_intel_suspend() function.
> 
> Stuff stops appearing on the screen in the middle of the second
> pci_restore_state() call.  That is, I see messages about "restoring
> config space at offset..." for each of the two devices, but a
> debugging message added at the end of pci_restore_state() doesn't
> appear for the second call.
> 
> (Should these config space changes occur at all, given that I'm
> testing with "echo devices >pm_test"?)
> 
> It's also worth noting that a debugging message added to the start of
> pci_restore_state() shows that for both of these calls,
> pdev->state_saved is false.  It's not clear whether that matters,
> though, because the suspend and resume routines in the PCI core do so
> many calls to pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state() on their own.
> 
> Commenting out the second call to pci_restore_state() apparently fixes 
> the problem.  I have no idea whether it's the right thing to do, 
> though.

It is.  The PCI core have restored the PCI config already anyway at the early
resume stage.

I think the first pci_restore_state() could be dropped from there as well.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-17 15:11 Suspend problems in 2.6.31-rc6 Alan Stern
2009-08-17 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-17 20:53   ` Alan Stern
2009-08-17 21:14     ` Greg KH
2009-08-17 21:15       ` Greg KH
2009-08-17 21:31         ` Jiri Slaby
2009-08-17 21:33           ` Jiri Slaby
2009-08-17 21:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-17 21:50       ` Alan Stern
2009-08-18 16:07     ` Alan Stern
2009-08-18 23:22       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-08-19  2:01         ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-19 14:42           ` Alan Stern
2009-08-20  1:05             ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-20 14:03               ` Alan Stern
2009-08-21  1:17                 ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-20 15:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 14:26         ` Alan Stern
2009-08-19 21:22           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 15:17             ` Alan Stern
2009-08-20 16:17               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-21  1:21               ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-21  3:13                 ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-21 14:32                   ` Alan Stern
2009-08-21 17:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-24  2:34                       ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-24 18:55                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25  0:59                         ` Alan Stern
2009-08-27 14:51                         ` Alan Stern
2009-08-27 16:18                           ` Jesse Barnes
2009-08-24  1:30                     ` Zhenyu Wang
2009-08-20 15:41             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 16:05               ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200908190122.17015.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox