From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: power draw depending on PHY speed Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20090901132529.GA2718@ucw.cz> References: <76FA3B279DD9DA48896E2B40494495720368E449@USA7061MS02.na.xerox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <76FA3B279DD9DA48896E2B40494495720368E449@USA7061MS02.na.xerox.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Leisner, Martin" Cc: martyleisner@yahoo.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2009-08-28 08:26:13, Leisner, Martin wrote: > While doing some current probe measurements (i.e. to measure the effects > of NAP and frequency scaling with a freescale processor) I noticed some > very > significant differents if we ran on 100Mbit of 1000Mbit ethernet. Yep, difference seems to be cca 1W. I had stupid shell script to switch it... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html