From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] adb trackpad disappears after suspend to ram Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:22 +0200 Message-ID: <200910072218.22357.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <878wkl6vce.fsf@scholz.fias.uni-frankfurt.de> <1253741332.7103.324.camel@pasglop> <878wfnt9je.fsf@scholz.fias.uni-frankfurt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <878wfnt9je.fsf@scholz.fias.uni-frankfurt.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Jan Scholz Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg , Ingo Molnar , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Jan Scholz wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes: > > >> Alternatively, you could introduce a new flag IRQF_NOSUSPEND and use that > >> instead of IRQF_TIMER. That would be cleaner than using IRQF_TIMER for > >> non-timer interrupts IMHO. > > > > I totally agree. The current patch is still good for stable though. > > > > I'll send it to Greg after I've upstreamed it, we can introduce IRQF_NOSUSPEND > > in a second patch. > > How's upstreaming going? I can neither find the patch in Linus branch, > nor in linux-next. Could it be that it got lost? More likely Ben didn't have the time to work on it. Best, Rafael