From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] kernel/power/: use pr_ and add pr_fmt(fmt) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:59:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20091011085859.GA1337@ucw.cz> References: <200910060037.57546.rjw@sisk.pl> <1255060436.16347.36.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <200910102328.37108.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910102328.37108.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Joe Perches , Len Brown , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > > Here's the same patch redone against -next. > > > > Added #define pr_fmt(fmt) "PM: " fmt > > Converted printk(KERN_ to pr_( > > Converted printks without KERN_ to pr_info or pr_cont > > Removed hard coded "PM: " prefix from message strings > > Added pr_fmt() to __initdata strings > > Integrated multiple line strings > > All logging messages are now output prefixed with "PM: " > > Does this patch depend on any other patch that haven't been merged yet? > > I still don't like pr_info(), pr_error() and pr_crit(). Well, rest of kernel uses them, they are shorter, and will save few bytes too... so why not? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html