From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc,
	perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:27:12 +0100
Message-ID: <200911091527.12249.rjw@sisk.pl>
References: <200911091250.31626.rjw@sisk.pl>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.0911091452300.2725@localhost.localdomain>
	<1257776176.6365.8.camel@marge.simson.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1257776176.6365.8.camel@marge.simson.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 09 November 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> 
> > > ok, then my observation should not apply.
> > 
> > I think it _IS_ releated because the worker_thread is CPU affine and
> > the debug_smp_processor_id() check does:
> > 
> >     if (cpumask_equal(&current->cpus_allowed, cpumask_of(this_cpu)))
> > 
> > which prevents that usage of smp_processor_id() in ksoftirqd and
> > keventd in preempt enabled regions is warned on.
> > 
> > We saw exaclty the same back trace with fd21073 (sched: Fix affinity
> > logic in select_task_rq_fair()).
> > 
> > Rafael, can you please add a printk to debug_smp_processor_id() so we
> > can see on which CPU we are running ? I suspect we are on the wrong
> > one.
> 
> I wonder if that's not intimately related to the problem I had, namely
> newidle balancing offline CPUs as they're coming up, making a mess of
> cpu enumeration.

Very likely.  What did you do to fix it?

Rafael