From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Async serio suspend/resume? Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:34:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20091201233406.GC20335@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <200912012355.49050.rjw@sisk.pl> <20091201231008.GB20335@core.coreip.homeip.net> <200912020023.00067.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912020023.00067.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:22:59AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:55:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > > Do you think it would be safe to allow serio devices to use the async > > > suspend/resume now? > > > > > > > Should be fine now, although I would not enable it in .32. But .33 seems > > like a good target. > > The entire async suspend/resume patchset is targeted at .33, so this is all > fine. > > So, I guess I can put the appended patch into my linux-next branch? > Sure, go head. -- Dmitry