From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: fix a lockdep warning in runtime.c
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912022215.29098.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0912021553010.3041-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> This patch (as1309) fixes a lockdep warning in
> __pm_runtime_set_status(). This is the one place where the runtime PM
> framework acquires a nested power.lock, and the nesting is never more
> than one deep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
I have a very simila patch queued up already. The only difference is that it
uses SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING instead of the new symbol. My version is appended
below.
>
> ---
>
> If anybody is using the runtime PM framework in 2.6.32 then this
> should be pushed before the final release.
I'll push it to Linus, then, if there still is time. Would you mind if I used
my version?
Thanks,
Rafael
> Index: usb-2.6/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ usb-2.6/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> +#define RPM_LOCK_PARENT 1
> +
> static int __pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev, bool from_wq);
> static int __pm_request_idle(struct device *dev);
> static int __pm_request_resume(struct device *dev);
> @@ -793,7 +795,7 @@ int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct devic
> }
>
> if (parent) {
> - spin_lock(&parent->power.lock);
> + spin_lock_nested(&parent->power.lock, RPM_LOCK_PARENT);
>
> /*
> * It is invalid to put an active child under a parent that is
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: PM / Runtime: Fix lockdep warning in __pm_runtime_set_status()
Lockdep complains about taking the parent lock in
__pm_runtime_set_status(), so mark it as nested.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct devic
}
if (parent) {
- spin_lock(&parent->power.lock);
+ spin_lock_nested(&parent->power.lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
/*
* It is invalid to put an active child under a parent that is
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-02 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-02 20:56 [PATCH] PM: fix a lockdep warning in runtime.c Alan Stern
2009-12-02 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-12-02 21:36 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912022215.29098.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox