From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: Runtime PM: Calling Device runtime PM callbacks?
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:34:15 +0100
Message-ID: <200912131334.15527.rjw@sisk.pl>
References: <175E0F9A9EFCEA46A65F5552BB057298C5F19EC7@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <175E0F9A9EFCEA46A65F5552BB057298C5F19EC7@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: "Mahalingam, Nithish" <nithish.mahalingam@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org" <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 13 December 2009, Mahalingam, Nithish wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> I was wondering why PM Runtime Core cannot call the device PM callbacks when 
> its device's bus does not support runtime PM (if such a scenario is valid)?

The assumption was it wouldn't be necessary, but the approach can be extended
to device types and device classes.

> Regards,	
> Nithish Mahalingam
> P.S. Alan, Not sure if you are askin the a similar question in the 
> "System sleep vs. runtime PM" mail thread.

I guess so.

Rafael