From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:15:13 +0200 Message-ID: <201005172215.13132.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1272667021-21312-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <20100514231510.GG16989@thunk.org> <87r5laa4oc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87r5laa4oc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jesse Barnes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arjan van de Ven , Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , Jacob Pan , Arve@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, Oleg Nesterov , Liam Girdwood , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Daniel Walker , tytso@mit.edu, Brian Swetland , Mark Brown , Geoff Smith , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Monday 17 May 2010, Kevin Hilman wrote: > tytso@mit.edu writes: ... > At least for OMAP, I don't consider "config it out" a viable option. > > We would like one kernel (in particular one PM core) to be usable for > a broad range of devices: maemo/meego, Android, webOS, Archos, and > whatever else we haven't seen yet. You don't need to config it out in the first place, so this argument doesn't really fly. Besides, I don't get how rejecting the opportunisting suspend feature would help us achieve this goal. Rafael