Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-27T22:45:32Z

On Thursday 27 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer we avoided mixing them up. Everyone seems fairly happy with
> > the current operator ordered suspend behaviour I believe ?
>
> No. The current mechanism can lose wakeup events.

As long as the operator agrees to lose wakeup events occasionally, which is
the case at least 99% of the time, there's nothing wrong with that IMO.

Rafael