From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver. 2] PM: describe kernel policy regarding wakeup defaults
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:57:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006082257.16193.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1006081508490.1372-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Tuesday 08 June 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> This patch (as1381b) updates a comment describing the kernel's policy
> toward enabling wakeup by default.
>
> It also makes device_set_wakeup_capable() actually do something when
> CONFIG_PM isn't enabled. It's not clear this is necessary; however if
> it isn't then device_init_wakeup() and device_can_wakeup() should also
> be do-nothing routines. Furthermore, I don't expect this change to
> have any noticeable effect -- but if it does then clearly the old
> behavior was wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>
> ---
>
> Rafael, I don't know if you got the earlier version of this patch.
I did.
> This one applies against 2.6.35-rc1.
I assume I should replace the old patch with this one.
Rafael
> Index: usb-2.6/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-2.6.orig/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> +++ usb-2.6/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> @@ -29,8 +29,11 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>
> -/* changes to device_may_wakeup take effect on the next pm state change.
> - * by default, devices should wakeup if they can.
> +/* Changes to device_may_wakeup take effect on the next pm state change.
> + *
> + * By default, most devices should leave wakeup disabled. The exceptions
> + * are devices that everyone expects to be wakeup sources: keyboards,
> + * power buttons, possibly network interfaces, etc.
> */
> static inline void device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool val)
> {
> @@ -59,7 +62,7 @@ static inline bool device_may_wakeup(str
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_PM */
>
> -/* For some reason the next two routines work even without CONFIG_PM */
> +/* For some reason the following routines work even without CONFIG_PM */
> static inline void device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool val)
> {
> dev->power.can_wakeup = val;
> @@ -67,6 +70,7 @@ static inline void device_init_wakeup(st
>
> static inline void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool capable)
> {
> + dev->power.can_wakeup = capable;
> }
>
> static inline bool device_can_wakeup(struct device *dev)
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 19:12 [PATCH ver. 2] PM: describe kernel policy regarding wakeup defaults Alan Stern
2010-06-08 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-06-08 21:24 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-12 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006082257.16193.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox