Re: [PATCH ver. 2] PM: describe kernel policy regarding wakeup defaults

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Tuesday, June 08, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday 08 June 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > This patch (as1381b) updates a comment describing the kernel's policy
> > > toward enabling wakeup by default.
> > > 
> > > It also makes device_set_wakeup_capable() actually do something when
> > > CONFIG_PM isn't enabled.  It's not clear this is necessary; however if
> > > it isn't then device_init_wakeup() and device_can_wakeup() should also
> > > be do-nothing routines.  Furthermore, I don't expect this change to
> > > have any noticeable effect -- but if it does then clearly the old
> > > behavior was wrong.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Rafael, I don't know if you got the earlier version of this patch.  
> > 
> > I did.
> > 
> > > This one applies against 2.6.35-rc1.
> > 
> > I assume I should replace the old patch with this one.
> 
> Yes.  If nothing else, the merge will be simpler.

Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next.

Rafael