From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pm_qos: reimplement using plists Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 00:22:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201007020022.02711.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1277746434.10879.191.camel@mulgrave.site> <1277746942.10879.198.camel@mulgrave.site> <20100629043903.GA6250@gvim.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100629043903.GA6250@gvim.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, markgross@thegnar.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, mark gross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:42:22PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > A lot of the pm_qos extremal value handling is really duplicating what a > > priority ordered list does, just in a less efficient fashion. Simply > > redoing the implementation in terms of a plist gets rid of a lot of this > > junk (although there are several other strange things that could do with > > tidying up, like pm_qos_request_list has to carry the pm_qos_class with > > every node, simply because it doesn't get passed in to > > pm_qos_update_request even though every caller knows full well what > > parameter it's updating). > > > > I think this redo is a win independent of android, so we should do > > something like this now. > > Thank you for doing this!, I'll integrate it into some testing targets > in the morning! > > Signed-off-by: mark gross > > --mgross > > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next. Rafael