From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: make runtime_status attribute not debug-only
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:29:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007032129.24889.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1007021959520.24201-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Saturday, July 03, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Friday, July 02, 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > This patch (as1404) makes the runtime_status sysfs attribute available
> > > even in the absence of CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG, and it changes the
> > > routine to display "unknown" when runtime PM is disabled for a device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Maybe "unsupported" would be a little better than "unknown". What do
> > > you think?
> >
> > I thought about that. "Unsupported" seems to suggest that the device/driver
> > doesn't support runtime PM, whiile in fact it may be supported, although it's
> > not enabled at the moment.
>
> Drivers that support runtime PM generally don't leave it disabled for
> very long. IMO this wouldn't be terribly misleading.
Well, whatever. I'm fine with that either way.
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-03 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-02 16:51 [PATCH] PM: make runtime_status attribute not debug-only Alan Stern
2010-07-02 18:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-07-02 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-03 0:03 ` Alan Stern
2010-07-03 19:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-07-06 13:58 ` [PATCH ver. 2] " Alan Stern
2010-07-07 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007032129.24889.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox