From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 06:58:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20100804045813.GA33951@dspnet.fr>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008021627290.29820@asgard.lang.hm>
	<AANLkTi=1kBuyPS_P+eNLcnRu1mJH6BzpzQW_sENZuL1L@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008022121430.6545@asgard.lang.hm>
	<AANLkTikhcYzNp8CPp8cqrV7Ey5CLMWu1sJTNxUtEi2as@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008022203470.6545@asgard.lang.hm>
	<AANLkTinFT5jq4nUhUpzS5S4TVDQGj0S7RtRgxNhsz2UF@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008031611100.6545@asgard.lang.hm>
	<20100804001015.GJ2407@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008031723530.6545@asgard.lang.hm>
	<AANLkTinjH0C0bSK=Y2wKASnbJFsR2BN303xBXkaHbmRC@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinjH0C0bSK=Y2wKASnbJFsR2BN303xBXkaHbmRC@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= <arve@android.com>
Cc: david@lang.hm, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, peterz@infradead.org, swetland@google.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, florian@mickler.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, tglx@linutronix.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:39:22PM -0700, Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote:
> If you just program the alarm you will wake up see that the monotonic
> clock has not advanced and set the alarm another n seconds into the
> future. Or are proposing that suspend should be changed to keep the
> monotonic clock running?

You're supposed to fix the clock after you wake up.  That's part of
the cost of going suspend.

  OG.