From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread,
	take three
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:57:51 +0100
Message-ID: <20100813115751.3bbbafbd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
References: <20100808155719.GB3635@thunk.org>
	<AANLkTinM5e2HGOFavODPZNzZx4KshDSjsvKN4pLpGGgr@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100808213821.GD3635@thunk.org>
	<20100809112453.77210acc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	<20100809181638.GI3026@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<AANLkTikwHaKpLdRdxmZj6JDJnsZ+o-jzbVcXhRW3Jmd9@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100811222854.GJ2516@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<AANLkTimahmGikeai8QnAxCy45deT00-6T7h-eA-NqL4G@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100812010612.GL2516@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<AANLkTinVV1NVHFPeO0p_e2pCtNwTNB932q9tbu9MMD3_@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100812034435.GA7403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100812034435.GA7403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: david@lang.hm, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, peterz@infradead.org, Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@suse.de, galibert@pobox.com, florian@mickler.org, menage@google.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, swmike@swm.pp.se, tglx@linutronix.de, arjan@infradead.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

> > Think in terms of an ARM laptop. What good is opportunistic suspend if
> > it's not going to help when the laptop is being used?
> 
> For when the laptop is not being used, presumably.

Or in time between keystrokes for most of the platform (backlight
excepted). The Intel MID x86 devices are at the point that suspend/resume
time on x86 is being hurt by the kernel rewriting smp alternatives as we
go from 2 processors live to 1 and back.

Alan