From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove the pm_message_t argument from driver suspend Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:50:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20110310205008.GB7750@redhat.com> References: <201103102113.05946.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103102113.05946.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM mailing list , Greg KH , LKML , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > None of the existing cpufreq drivers uses the second argument of > its .suspend() callback (which isn't useful anyway), so remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > > Hi, > > This patch is requisite for sysdevs rework discussed here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/9/439 > Please apply or let me know if I can take it to the suspend tree. Looks ok to me. applied and queued for .39 thanks, Dave