From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 32 bit s2disk on 64 bit kernel Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201106172125.02276.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <4DFA1DA5.1010502@wasp.net.au> <4DFA96CB.8080806@wasp.net.au> <4DFAC174.7040904@wasp.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DFAC174.7040904@wasp.net.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday, June 17, 2011, Brad Campbell wrote: > On 17/06/11 07:50, Brad Campbell wrote: > >>> I run an entirely 32 bit userspace on a 64bit kernel. I've compiled suspend-utils from todays git > >>> tree. trying to use s2disk results in the following : > >>> > >>> Is this a supported configuration? > >> > >> No, it isn't. > > > > Hrm.. ok thanks for that. Back to tuxonice I guess. > > Scratch that. I compiled up suspend-utils on a 64 bit machine with an added -all-static ld flag and > it's working great. > > I would have thought that with the proliferation of 64 bit procs in laptops that this configuration > would be more prevalent, but perhaps I'm an oddball. Do you mean 32-bit user space with 64-bit kernel? Rafael