From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 32 bit s2disk on 64 bit kernel Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:44:09 +0200 Message-ID: <201106181244.09906.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <4DFA1DA5.1010502@wasp.net.au> <201106172125.02276.rjw@sisk.pl> <4DFBF6EA.30609@wasp.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DFBF6EA.30609@wasp.net.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Brad Campbell Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, June 18, 2011, Brad Campbell wrote: > On 18/06/11 03:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> Scratch that. I compiled up suspend-utils on a 64 bit machine with an added -all-static ld flag and > >> it's working great. > >> > >> I would have thought that with the proliferation of 64 bit procs in laptops that this configuration > >> would be more prevalent, but perhaps I'm an oddball. > > > > Do you mean 32-bit user space with 64-bit kernel? > > Yes. It's not too common as far as I can tell. User space can get some advantage from 64-bitness too. :-) > It turns out Virtualbox can't cope with a 32bit userspace on a 64bit kernel > either (which is no bother as I now have a kvm capable CPU, and kvm copes nicely). > > I have it working, but of course it's too much of a pain to get splashy & directfb > and the rest of the playground fun to compile and link statically. The text screen > is enough for me anyway. Good, thanks for your feedback! Rafael