From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
markgross@thegnar.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Pihet-XID, Jean" <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPU C-state breakage with PM Qos change
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 21:16:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202062116.16744.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuW7mBCZdGqScX5jjaYDhijZH_H7vDKkJ4v6WWHn9rUsGw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, February 06, 2012, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael, Mark,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> ...
>
> >> In kernel/power/Makefile:
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += main.o qos.o
> >>
> >> I guess that explains things. :-)
> > Initially I thought we should have a way of disabling the feature on
> > some (minimal) kernels and so thought CONFIG_PM was the option to use.
> >
> >> It's quite easy to make qos.o be independent of CONFIG_PM, in which case the
> >> code added by Venki can be removed, so patches welcome (for 3.4, though).
> > I am working on it, more to come soon.
>
> I have a couple of patches ready, to be applied on 3.3-rc1 (so without
> Venki's patch applied).
> The first one is on PM QoS, the second one on per-device PM QoS. Is
> the latter needed?
I'm not sure without looking. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1328227065-22045-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>
[not found] ` <1328228079-20716-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>
2012-02-03 14:04 ` [PATCH] CPU C-state breakage with PM Qos change Pihet-XID, Jean
2012-02-03 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-05 3:50 ` mark gross
2012-02-05 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-06 10:18 ` Jean Pihet
2012-02-06 16:42 ` Jean Pihet
2012-02-06 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-02-07 8:39 ` Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201202062116.16744.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).