From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the per-device constraints feature
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:07:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120212020757.GF18742@gs62> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328603646-2714-3-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
why are these two patches?
I think you could squash them into one and it would be just fine.
--mark
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> The per-device PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends
> on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU C-states with kernels
> not having these CONFIGs.
>
> This patch allows the feature in all cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/Makefile | 3 ++-
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 39 ---------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/Makefile b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> index 2e58ebb..312eb65 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o qos.o
> +obj-y += qos.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += sysfs.o generic_ops.o common.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += main.o wakeup.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME) += runtime.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_TRACE_RTC) += trace.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 105be69..37b017a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier);
> int pm_qos_request_active(struct pm_qos_request *req);
> s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_constraints *c);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> @@ -94,43 +93,5 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev);
> void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev);
> int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value);
> -#else
> -static inline s32 __dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline s32 dev_pm_qos_read_value(struct device *dev)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> - s32 new_value)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(struct device *dev,
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_remove_global_notifier(
> - struct notifier_block *notifier)
> - { return 0; }
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_ON;
> -}
> -static inline void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - dev->power.power_state = PMSG_INVALID;
> -}
> -static inline int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
> - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 value)
> - { return 0; }
> -#endif
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-12 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 8:34 [PATCH 0/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the feature Jean Pihet
2012-02-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jean Pihet
2012-02-12 2:06 ` mark gross
2012-02-12 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 13:50 ` [PATCH] " Jean Pihet
2012-02-13 15:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 15:40 ` Jean Pihet
2012-02-17 19:27 ` Pavel Machek
2012-02-17 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-07 8:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the per-device constraints feature Jean Pihet
2012-02-12 2:07 ` mark gross [this message]
2012-02-12 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-15 15:33 ` mark gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120212020757.GF18742@gs62 \
--to=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox