From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] cpuidle: coupled: add parallel barrier function
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 23:31:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205092331.24487.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336438662-10484-5-git-send-email-ccross@android.com>
On Tuesday, May 08, 2012, Colin Cross wrote:
> Adds cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier, which can be used by coupled
> cpuidle state enter functions to handle resynchronization after
> determining if any cpu needs to abort. The normal use case will
> be:
>
> static bool abort_flag;
> static atomic_t abort_barrier;
>
> int arch_cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev, ...)
> {
> if (arch_turn_off_irq_controller()) {
> /* returns an error if an irq is pending and would be lost
> if idle continued and turned off power */
> abort_flag = true;
> }
>
> cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(dev, &abort_barrier);
>
> if (abort_flag) {
> /* One of the cpus didn't turn off it's irq controller */
> arch_turn_on_irq_controller();
> return -EINTR;
> }
>
> /* continue with idle */
> ...
> }
>
> This will cause all cpus to abort idle together if one of them needs
> to abort.
>
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> index 93101fb..3e65de1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,43 @@ struct cpuidle_coupled {
> static cpumask_t cpuidle_coupled_poked_mask;
>
> /**
> + * cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier - synchronize all online coupled cpus
> + * @dev: cpuidle_device of the calling cpu
> + * @a: atomic variable to hold the barrier
> + *
> + * No caller to this function will return from this function until all online
> + * cpus in the same coupled group have called this function. Once any caller
> + * has returned from this function, the barrier is immediately available for
> + * reuse.
> + *
> + * The atomic variable a must be initialized to 0 before any cpu calls
> + * this function, will be reset to 0 before any cpu returns from this function.
> + *
> + * Must only be called from within a coupled idle state handler
> + * (state.enter when state.flags has CPUIDLE_FLAG_COUPLED set).
> + *
> + * Provides full smp barrier semantics before and after calling.
> + */
> +void cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(struct cpuidle_device *dev, atomic_t *a)
> +{
> + int n = dev->coupled->online_count;
> +
> + smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
> + atomic_inc(a);
> +
> + while (atomic_read(a) < n)
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + if (atomic_inc_return(a) == n * 2) {
> + atomic_set(a, 0);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + while (atomic_read(a) > n)
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
Well, this looks like "wait until all CPUs execute this code". Don't we have
anything like this already somewhere?
> +
> +/**
> * cpuidle_state_is_coupled - check if a state is part of a coupled set
> * @dev: struct cpuidle_device for the current cpu
> * @drv: struct cpuidle_driver for the platform
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> index 6038448..5ab7183 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ static inline int cpuidle_wrap_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED
> +void cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(struct cpuidle_device *dev, atomic_t *a);
> +#endif
Why exactly is the extra Kconfig option necessary?
> +
> /******************************
> * CPUIDLE GOVERNOR INTERFACE *
> ******************************/
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-08 0:57 [PATCHv3 0/4] coupled cpuidle state support Colin Cross
2012-05-08 0:57 ` [PATCHv4 1/4] cpuidle: refactor out cpuidle_enter_state Colin Cross
2012-05-09 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08 0:57 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] cpuidle: fix error handling in __cpuidle_register_device Colin Cross
2012-05-09 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08 0:57 ` [PATCHv4 3/4] cpuidle: add support for states that affect multiple cpus Colin Cross
2012-05-09 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-08 0:57 ` [PATCHv4 4/4] cpuidle: coupled: add parallel barrier function Colin Cross
2012-05-09 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-05-10 22:47 ` Colin Cross
2012-05-11 18:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-18 10:36 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] coupled cpuidle state support Santosh Shilimkar
2012-05-18 19:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-18 20:18 ` Colin Cross
2012-05-19 7:04 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205092331.24487.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).