From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6 v4] cpufreq: tolerate inexact values when collecting stats Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:24:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20121113162449.GE9327@x1.osrc.amd.com> References: <1351631056-25938-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <1352313166-28980-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <1352313166-28980-4-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <20121111163821.GA21635@x1.osrc.amd.com> <50A12565.4070701@calxeda.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:38974 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752108Ab2KMQYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:24:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A12565.4070701@calxeda.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Langsdorf Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , MyungJoo Ham On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:35:49AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > The function is buried pretty deep in the cpufreq_stat code. It didn't > seem appropriate to make it a function pointer as part of struct > cpufreq_driver. Right, what's cpufreq-speak for if (Calxeda) shift by 10 ? Better yet, add a flag or a bitfield called "minimize_jitter" or similar and set it only on your hardware... Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.