From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/25] PM / Domains: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:23:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20121226012345.GJ10220@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1356141435-17340-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <21556832.hKrqJSonFg@vostro.rjw.lan> <20121225170328.GH10220@mtj.dyndns.org> <43765611.nGGJ409TUC@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:62511 "EHLO mail-vc0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752677Ab2LZBXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:23:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43765611.nGGJ409TUC@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 09:33:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > OK, so I'd generally prefer changelogs like this: > > "There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item is pending > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it, so remove work_pending() > tests used in those cases." > > If that's fine with you, I'll queue up [16/25] and [11/25] for v3.9 > with the above as the changelog. Sure thing. Please go ahead. Thanks. -- tejun