From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: Warn user when powernow-k8 tries to fall back to acpi-cpufreq and it is unavailable. Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:38:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20130118193834.GA17734@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1357780161-30581-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> <20130111144940.GB21882@liondog.tnic> <20130111165054.GD10751@liondog.tnic> <4923C2DE085EEB4FAB1D375DD09D0BA6100CF170@sausexdag04.amd.com> <20130117115436.GA3853@pd.tnic> <20130118162347.GA31499@srcf.ucam.org> <20130118170755.GB4062@pd.tnic> <20130118190021.GD4062@pd.tnic> <20130118190659.GB16757@srcf.ucam.org> <20130118193656.GE4062@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:47143 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751905Ab3ARTil (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:38:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130118193656.GE4062@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov , "Gopalakrishnan, Aravind" , "rjw@sisk.pl" , Andre Przywara , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andreas On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:36:56PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Ok, how much can we rely on ACPI to have this ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO > properly set on K8? Because the thing is, we want to use acpi-cpufreq on > F10h onwards and leave powernow-k8 to K8s. SYSTEM_IO only supports single processors and was superceded in ACPI 2.0. Are there any single-core F10h? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org