From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:32:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20130205113242.GF4827@pd.tnic> References: <20130204165057.GH13909@pd.tnic> <20130205091532.GA4827@pd.tnic> <20130205102721.GB4827@pd.tnic> <20130205110407.GC4827@pd.tnic> <20130205111918.GD4827@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, Charles Garcia-Tobin List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:56:03PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Just some kind of indication from platform driver is required about > how/where it wants its governor directory to be present. The indication is this: config CPUFREQ_PLATFORM_DRIVER_X ... select CPUFREQ_MULTIPLE_POLICIES You really need to slow down and really look at what I'm proposing. > And the variable suits more here. And this variable means nothing on other systems so why add it in the first place? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --